Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Thant v. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc., et al
as 21-1657
Plaintiff / Appellant: MYO THANT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: HEATHER MEHDI
Defendant / Appellee: KARYOPHARM THERAPEUTICS INC., MICHAEL G. KAUFFMAN, SHARON SHACHAM and others
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2020cv12213
Defendant: Michael G Kauffman, Deepika R Pakianathan, Barry E Greene and others
Plaintiff: Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trsut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Hansen v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00226
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Scott Garland Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boros v. Renton et al
as 3:2020cv03864
Defendant: Scott Garland, John H. Johnson, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff: BRUCE BOROS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ryder v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03810
Defendant: Scott Garland, Ted W. Love, John H. Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Alex Ryder
Lombard v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00769
Defendant: Scott Garland, Ted W. Love, Odyssey Merger Sub Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Richard Lombard
Zielenski v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04279
Defendant: Scott Garland, Jeffrey Bird, John H. Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Christohper Zielenski
Stoltz v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03680
Defendant: Scott Garland, John H. Johnson, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff: Johan Stoltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xian v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04254
Defendant: Scott Garland, John H. Johnson, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff: Weijie Xian
Howland v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02448
Defendant: Scott Garland, John H. Johnson, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff: Philip Howland

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?