Lovoi v. ConocoPhillips et al
Gerald Joseph Lovoi |
Gay Huey Evans, Caroline Maury Devine, Arjun N. Murti, R.A. Walker, Jody Freeman, Admiral William H. McRaven, ConocoPhillips, Charles E. Bunch, David T. Seaton, John V. Faraci, Ryan M. Lance, Jeffrey A. Joerres, Eric Mullins, Sharmila Mulligan and Robert A. Niblock |
1:2020cv01638 |
December 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
No Summons Issued. (myr) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 14(a) AND 20(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 filed with Jury Demand against Charles E. Bunch, ConocoPhillips, Caroline Maury Devine, Gay Huey Evans, John V. Faraci, Jody Freeman, Jeffrey A. Joerres, Ryan M. Lance, Admiral William H. McRaven, Sharmila Mulligan, Eric Mullins, Arjun N. Murti, Robert A. Niblock, David T. Seaton, R.A. Walker - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3367465.) - filed by Gerald Joseph Lovoi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.