Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Mayorkas et al
as 6:2023cv00771
Defendant:
Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas, The National Security Council and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clara Brockington v. Lowe's Home Improvement
as 21-1016
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT A. NIBLOCK, MR. BELTON, MARVIN ELLISON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARA LEWIS BROCKINGTON
Stracener v. ConocoPhillips et al
as 1:2020cv10954
Defendant:
Caroline Maury Devine, Arjun N. Murti, R.A. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Mondee Stacener and Mondee Stracener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Davydov v. ConocoPhillips et al
as 1:2020cv01674
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Caroline Maury Devine, Arjun N. Murti and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Davydov
Lovoi v. ConocoPhillips et al
as 1:2020cv01638
Defendant:
Gay Huey Evans, Caroline Maury Devine, Arjun N. Murti and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Brockington v. Lowe's Home Improvement et al
as 4:2020cv03157
Defendant:
Lowe's Corporate Office, Purvis Walker, Marvin Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Clara Lewis Brockington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swords v. Mulva et al
as 1:2011cv01250
Plaintiff:
Patricia Swords
Defendant:
James J. Mulva, Kenneth M. Duberstein, Ruth R. Harkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Freedman v. Mulva et al
as 1:2011cv00686
Plaintiff:
Robert Freedman
Defendant:
James J. Mulva , Kenneth M. Duberstein , Ruth R. Harkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Du Vall v. Lowes Companies Inc, et al
as 07-51405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D DU VALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWES COMPANIES INC, a corporation, ROBERT A NIBLOCK, CEO, Chairman, DENNIS R KNOWLES, Store Operation, South Central and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
