Sullivan v. DeJoy et al
| Elizabeth Sullivan |
| Louis DeJoy and U.S. Postal Service |
| 1:2023cv01377 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting D.I. #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/11/2023. (mpb)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Louis DeJoy, U.S. Postal Service- filed by Elizabeth Sullivan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NACI Investigation, #2 Exhibit Emails, #3 Exhibits, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) |
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT in Support of #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Elizabeth Sullivan. (jfm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel - filed by Elizabeth Sullivan. (mkr) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Louis DeJoy and U.S. Postal Service - filed by Elizabeth Sullivan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Facts of Case, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Acknowledgement of Consent Form, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (mkr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Elizabeth Sullivan. (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
