KOCH v. DONALDSON, et al
Plaintiff: RANDOLPH S. KOCH
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER COX
Case Number: 1:2002cv01492
Filed: July 26, 2002
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Jack D. Shanstrom
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER granting 93 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative for for Summary Judgment; directing the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment in favor of the defendant.. Signed on 1/6/11 by Judge Jack D. Shanstrom, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.(jeb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KOCH v. DONALDSON, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RANDOLPH S. KOCH
Represented By: Ellen K. Renaud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER COX
Represented By: Marina Utgoff Braswell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?