BOSTAN v. BUSH et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00883
Filed: May 3, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Presiding Judge: Reggie B. Walton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 287 MEMORANDUM OPINION. The attached memorandum opinion relates to the habeas corpus petition filed by Karim Bostan (ISN 975). The memorandum opinion was issued on October 12, 2011, and is now being released for public consumption upon the completion of the government's classification review. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 10-12-11 (lcrbw3).
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 233 MEMORANDUM OPINION. The attached redacted memorandum opinion concerns the habeas corpus petition of Karim Bostan (ISN 975). The memorandum opinion was issued on October 23, 2009, and released in redacted form for public consumption upon the completion of the government's classification review earlier this same date. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 10/23/2009 (lcrbw1).
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 229 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 8/19/09. (lcrbw3, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOSTAN v. BUSH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?