BARKO v. HALLIBURTON COMPANY et al
| HARRY BARKO |
| HALLIBURTON COMPANY, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., KBR TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT ENGINEERING CORPORATION, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INTERNATIONAL, INC., EAMAR, DAOUD & PARNTERS INC., EAMAR COMBINED FOR TRADING AND CONTRACTING COMPANY and KELLOG BROWN & ROOT |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2005cv01276 |
| June 27, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Emmet G. Sullivan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
298
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 12/06/2018. (lcrcl3)
|
|
Filing
243
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/9/15. The scheduling order will be revised upon a ruling by the Court of Appeals on the mandamus petition but the Court extends the discovery deadline from 3/30/15 to 4/30/15. The deposition of Derek Bonenclark shall proceed as scheduled pursuant to the conditions set forth in this entry. (Related Doc. 241 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
231
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/17/14. The Court denies Barko's request to compel production of witness statements contained in the COBC reports but grants Barko's motion to compel production of parts of the COBC repor ts as fully set forth in this order. KBR will produce portions of the reports, with redactions, as explained in this order. KBR will make these disclosures by 4:00 PM on 12/26/14. Barko shall not disclose the contents of the documents. If Barko uses or refers to the documents in subsequent filings in this case, such filings shall be made under seal. This order will remain in effect unless modified or lifted by the Court. (Related Docs. 180 , 216 , 217 , 230 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
184
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/10/14. The Court grants the motion of Defendant KBR for an extension until 10/20/14 to file their responding brief on the waiver issue and requires that both plaintiff and defendant file their response by 10 /20/14. Plaintiff's responding brief shall be no longer than 20 pages and defendant's responding brief shall be no longer than 25 pages. The parties, including the United States, shall provide in their briefs the disclosures and other related materials set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 182 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
155
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/11/14. The Court denies the KBR Defendants' motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal, denies the KBR Defendants' motion for a stay of the 3/6/14 Order and orders production of documents by KBR no later than 3/17/14 as set forth herein and denies the KBR Defendants' motion to seal the 3/6/14 Opinion and Order. (Related Docs. 151 , 152 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
145
OPINION AND ORDER (AMENDED) signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/21/14 denying defendants' motion to file Exhibit 3 to their opposition to relator's motion to compel under seal. (Related Doc. 138 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
116
OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/8/13 denying the motions to dismiss filed by Plaintiff-Relator Barko and Defendant Daoud. Further, the Court vacates the existing Protective Order. (Related Docs. 53 , 64 , 91 ) (Gwin, James)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on October 14, 2010. (lcegs2 )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
