ZAID et al v. BUSH et al
1:2005cv01646 |
August 16, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
John D. Bates |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 341 STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing petition without prejudice and allowing continued access pursuant to the 57 September 11, 2008, Protective Order. See text for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 5/20/2013. (lcjdb2) |
Filing 286 Order granting 272 petitioner's motion to lift the stay of habeas proceedings, and setting discovery and other deadlines. See text of Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/9/2010. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 247 ORDER granting 218 petitioner's renewed motion for discovery under section I.E.2 of the Case Management Order. This the public version of the Order. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/19/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 243 ORDER addressing 194 206 petitioner's motions regarding Task Force discovery and respondents' "protected" designations, and requiring filing of further status reports. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/17/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 231 ORDER resolving 194 petitioner's motion to compel and requiring a joint status report regarding 206 petitioner's motion for an order. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 5/27/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 217 ORDER amending briefing schedule and addressing issues raised during the May 7, 2009 status conference. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 5/7/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 191 ORDER setting briefing schedule and addressing issues raised during the April 2, 2009 status conference. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 4/3/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 183 ORDER denying 147 petitioner's motion to take Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Robert M. Gates. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/24/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 172 ORDER requiring status report by not later than March 11, 2009. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 3/4/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 168 ORDER granting 167 petitioner's motion for extension of time and amending scheduling order. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/24/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 146 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 136 respondents' motion for reconsideration. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/9/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 142 MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of 141 petitioner's motion for extension of time, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. See text of the Order for details. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/3/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 130 ORDER addressing petitioner's 115 motion to compel and directing respondents to provide the Court with additional information. See text of the Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/22/09. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 117 ORDER granting in part 114 petitioner's motion for extension of time. See text of the Order for details. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/14/09. (lcjdb1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ZAID et al v. BUSH et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.