KLAYMAN et al v. JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00670
Filed: April 12, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 615 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 9, 2019. (lcckk1)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 608 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on August 22, 2019. (lcckk1)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 604 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on August 7, 2019. (lcckk1)
March 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 581 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 18, 2019. (lcckk1)
March 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 526 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Regarding Counter-Plaintiffs' Proposed Introduction at Trial of Exhibits Through Deposition Testimony of Maureen Otis. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 9, 2018. (lcckk1)
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 516 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Regarding Counter-Plaintiffs' Proposed Exhibits for Use at Trial on March 8, 2018. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 8, 2018. (lcckk1)
March 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 513 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Regarding Counter-Plaintiffs' Proposed Exhibits for Use at Trial on March 7, 2018. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 7, 2018. (lcckk1)
March 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 508 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Regarding Counter-Plaintiffs' Proposed Exhibits for Use at Trial on March 5, 2018. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 5, 2018. (lcckk1 )
February 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 464 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on February 20, 2018. (lcckk1)
January 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 434 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on January 19, 2018. (lcckk1)
October 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 425 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's 414 Motion to Recuse/Disqualify Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly is DENIED. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/5/2017. (lcckk1)
June 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 401 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' 386 Motion Pursuant to the Courts January 13, 2017 Minute Order is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's 384 Motion to Consolidate is DENIED. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 6/15/2017. (lcckk1)
August 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 362 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on August 10, 2011. (lcckk3)
October 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 356 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on October 13, 2010. (lcckk3)
October 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 327 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on October 14, 2009. (lcckk2)
June 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 319 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on June 25, 2009. (lcckk2 )
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 301 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION on Defendants' Motion for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Court Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay on 3/24/09. (lcak1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KLAYMAN et al v. JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?