ADVOCATES FOR HIGHWAY AND AUTO SAFETY v. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFTEY ADMINISTRATION
| ADVOCATES FOR HIGHWAY AND AUTO SAFETY |
| FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFTEY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2007cv00467 |
| March 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Richard W. Roberts |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ADVOCATES FOR HIGHWAY AND AUTO SAFETY v. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFTEY ADMINISTRATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFTEY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Represented By: | Robin Michelle Meriweather |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ADVOCATES FOR HIGHWAY AND AUTO SAFETY | |
| Represented By: | Adina Rosenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
