SOLOMON v. JOHANNS
Plaintiff: LINDA SOLOMON
Defendant: MIKE JOHANNS
Case Number: 1:2007cv01590
Filed: September 7, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: John D. Bates
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION (unredacted). This is the partially unredacted version of 44 the memorandum opinion issued in this case. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 8/31/09. (lcjdb1)
August 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION (redacted). Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 8/31/09. (lcjdb1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SOLOMON v. JOHANNS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LINDA SOLOMON
Represented By: John F. Karl, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIKE JOHANNS
Represented By: Harry B. Roback
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?