BOARDLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BOARDLEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR, ERNIE QUINTANA, GERARD BAKER and MIKE PFLAUM
Case Number: 1:2007cv01986
Filed: November 2, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: James Robertson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER of USCA (certified copy) as to 59 Notice of Cross Appeal, filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ; ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is hereby granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the consolidation of this case with No. 09-5176 as cross-appeal be terminated. USCA Case Number 09-5186. (mmh, )
March 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER of USCA as to 59 Notice of Cross Appeal, filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ; ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal be granted, and this case is hereby dismissed; FURTHER ORDERED that the consolidation of this case with No. 09-5176 as cross-appeal be terminated. USCA Case Number 09-5186. (mmh, )
June 2, 2009 USCA Case Number 09-5186 for 59 Notice of Cross Appeal, filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE. (rdj)
May 21, 2009 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re 59 Notice of Cross Appeal, (rdj)
May 20, 2009 Filing 59 NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL as to 57 Order on Motion to Dismiss,, Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Reconsideration, by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (Meriweather, Robin)
May 13, 2009 USCA Case Number 09-5176 for 58 Notice of Appeal, filed by MICHAEL BOARDLEY. (rdj)
May 11, 2009 Filing 58 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 57 Order on Motion to Dismiss,, Order on Motion to Stay, Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Reconsideration, by MICHAEL BOARDLEY. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 00900000000001843702. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (Hacker, Heather)
March 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting defendants' motion for partial summary judgment 45 ; granting defendants' motion to dismiss 36 and denying as moot individual defendants' motion to dismiss 44 . Signed by Judge James Robertson on March 17, 2009. (MT)
November 2, 2007 Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against MIKE PFLAUM, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, MARY BOMAR, ERNIE QUINTANA, GERARD BAKER ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616008013) filed by MICHAEL BOARDLEY. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOARDLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BOARDLEY
Represented By: Jordan Woodard Lorence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DIRK KEMPTHORNE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARY BOMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERNIE QUINTANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GERARD BAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIKE PFLAUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?