AIELLO v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION

Justia Dockets & Filings D.C. Circuit District of Columbia District Court AIELLO v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION

AIELLO v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	BRIAN AIELLO
Defendant:	NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Case Number:	1:2008cv00130
Filed:	January 23, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office:	Washington, DC Office
County:	88888
Presiding Judge:	Emmet G. Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 22, 2010	Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Redacted Memorandum Opinion granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. On October 14, 2010, the parties submitted 33 sealed request for redactions in accordance with the Court's 31 order granting motion for summary judgment. The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions, and finds that while some of the redactions proposed refer to materials filed under seal, other proposed redactions refer to material that was filed on the public docket. Given the strong pr esumption in favor of public access to judicial records, see, e.g., Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978) ("It is clear that the courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and docu ments, including judicial records and documents."), the Court will accept only those proposed redactions that refer to materials which were filed under seal and do not appear on the public docket. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on October 22, 2010. (lcegs4)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 22, 2010

Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Redacted Memorandum Opinion granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment. On October 14, 2010, the parties submitted 33 sealed request for redactions in accordance with the Court's 31 order granting motion for summary judgment. The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions, and finds that while some of the redactions proposed refer to materials filed under seal, other proposed redactions refer to material that was filed on the public docket. Given the strong pr esumption in favor of public access to judicial records, see, e.g., Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978) ("It is clear that the courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and docu ments, including judicial records and documents."), the Court will accept only those proposed redactions that refer to materials which were filed under seal and do not appear on the public docket. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on October 22, 2010. (lcegs4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AIELLO v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN AIELLO
Represented By:	Lisa Alexis Jones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?