SEED COMPANY LIMITED et al v. WESTERMAN et al
| SEED COMPANY LIMITED and SHIGERU TAMAI |
| WILLIAM F. WESTERMAN, WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP, KRATZ, QUINTOS & HANSON, LLP, ARMSTRONG, KRATZ, QUINTOS, HANSON & BROOKS, LLP, ARMSTRONG, WESTERMAN & HATTORI, LLP, JOHN KONG, ED KENEHAN and JAMES ARMSTRONG, III |
| 1:2008cv00355 |
| February 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 99999 |
| Ricardo M. Urbina |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding 180 Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Under Rule 54(b) Directing Entry Of Final Judgment On The Court's July 18, 2017 Rulings And For An Order Staying Further Proceedings Pending Appeal Of Those Rulings. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 7/16/2019. (tg)
|
|
Filing
174
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 7/18/2017. (jth)
|
|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 07/30/14. (tb, )
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying without prejudice 34 the Westerman Defendants' motion for summary judgment; denying without prejudice 35 the Kratz Defendants' motion for summary judgment; granting the plaintiffs' request for discovery. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 1/5/12.(lcrmu1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
