BUELL v. WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 25, 2010
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 52 Motion to Strike. For the reasons set for in this order and at the hearings on the motions, Defendant Ameripark, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Affi davit of Wanda Mitchell is denied; Defendant Washington Hospital Center Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Ameripark, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment are denied based on the Court's finding that when the evidenc e is viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving parties, there are material questions of fact as to the adequacy of the pedestrian signage and markings at the site of the accident that preclude summary judgment; and based on the parties 9; representations that they are willing to participate in settlement negotiations that could resolve this case short of trial, this case shall be referred to a Magistrate Judge for settlement negotiations. The parties shall appear before this Court for a status conference at the conclusion of the settlement negotiations on June 7, 2009, at 9 a.m. in Courtroom 16 of the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. If the case has not settled by this date, the Court will schedule a pretrial hearing date at that time. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 03/25/10. (lcrbw2)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?