PERRY v. RICE
Plaintiff: JANINE PERRY
Defendant: CONDOLEEZZA RICE
Case Number: 1:2008cv01216
Filed: July 16, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Henry H. Kennedy
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 97 COPY OF UNSEALED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION dated 8/30/11 signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (jeb, )
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION re [25, 26]. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 12/10/2009. (lcrcl4, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PERRY v. RICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANINE PERRY
Represented By: Michael Gerard Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CONDOLEEZZA RICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?