CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON et al v. CHENEY et al
| CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, STANLEY I. KUTLER, MARTIN J. SHERWIN, AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS |
| RICHARD B. CHENEY, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION and ALLEN WEINSTEIN |
| 1:2008cv01548 |
| September 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| 11001 |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on January 19, 2009. (lcckk1)
|
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against RICHARD B. CHENEY, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, ALLEN WEINSTEIN ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616014861) filed by SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS, CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, STANLEY I. KUTLER, MARTIN J. SHERWIN, AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(td, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
