AL-HAWSAWI v. GATES
Petitioner: MUSTAFA BIN-AHMAD AL-HAWSAWI
Respondent: ROBERT M. GATES
Case Number: 1:2008cv01645
Filed: September 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Leon
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this case is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that Motion 8 for Miscellaneous Relief is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 1/28/09. (see order.) (kc ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AL-HAWSAWI v. GATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MUSTAFA BIN-AHMAD AL-HAWSAWI
Represented By: Scott L. Fenstermaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ROBERT M. GATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?