SAINT-JEAN et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION et al
| MICA SAINT-JEAN, GUERLINE BOURCIQUOT and MARIE DORLUS |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION and MICHELLE SMITH |
| 1:2008cv01769 |
| October 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| 88888 |
| Richard W. Roberts |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 137 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 137 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 11/21/14. (lcrwr2)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART defendant D.C.'s motion [23, 37-1] to dismiss. The motion will be GRANTED as to the plaintiffs' quantum meruit and defamation by conduct claims. The motion will be DENIED as to the plaintiffs' Whistleblower Protection Act claim, and as to those portions of the plaintiffs' Fair Labor Standards Act claim that post-date October 16, 2005. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 3/7/12. (lcrwr2)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the plaintiffs' motion 49 for leave to file a second amended complaint against the District of Columbia. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 2/21/12. (lcrwr2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
