PAULINE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| JOHN PAULINE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME-WASHINGTON and PEARSON SUNDERLAND |
| 1:2008cv01788 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
| 88888 |
| Richard W. Roberts |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1402 Medical Malpractice |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 70 granting in part and denying part the Federal Defendants' motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 68 Dr. Pearson Sunderland's motion for summary judgment; and granting in part an d denying in part 69 the motion for summary judgment filed by Professional Services of America, Inc. and Ms. Viola Johnson-Robinson. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before April 3, 2015 indicating their respective views on how this case should proceed. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on March 13, 2015. (MA)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs file a memorandum addressing these issues by September 17, 2013. It is further ORDERED that the defendants respond to the plaintiffs' memorandum on these issues by October 1, 2013. Signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 8/27/2013. (lcrwr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
