MOHAMED et al v. GATES
| ISMAIL MOHAMED and ALI MOHAMED |
| ROBERT GATES |
| 1:2008cv01789 |
| October 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| 99999 |
| Richard W. Roberts |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER granting Respondent's sealed consent motion 104 to deem as protected certain information in the proposed public factual return. See Order for additional deadlines and information. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 09/20/2011. (DCL)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER directing the respondents to file a status report by July 31, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 7/13/2009. (DCL)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER regarding procedures for petitioner to review statements. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 6/25/09. (lin, )
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part petitioner's renewed emergency motion 65 for an order directing the government to allow him to review and retain his alleged statements contained in the respondents factual return, and to have access to those statements before he meets with his counsel on June 12, 2009. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 6/10/2009. (DCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
