TRUESDALE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al
| ALVIN B. TRUESDALE |
| ADRIENNE R. POTEAT, STEVE HUSK, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., THOMAS W. HUTCHINSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WANDA M. HUNT, MELAINE ANN PUSTAY and JOHN AND JANE DOE |
| 1:2008cv01862 |
| October 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| 88888 |
| Paul L. Friedman |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:552 Freedom of Information Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
OPINION granting defendants' renewed motion for summary judgment. An appropriate order accompanies this opinion. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on August 17, 2011. (MA)
|
|
Filing
67
OPINION granting in part and denying in part defendant's renewed motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. An appropriate order accompanies this opinion. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on August 13, 2010.(MA)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION granting in part and denying in part without prejudice defendants' motion to dismiss. An order consistent with this opinion will be issued this same day. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on September 29, 2009. (MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
