WASHINGTON MAILERS UNION LOCAL M-29 v. WASHINGTON POST
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MAILERS UNION LOCAL M-29
Defendant: WASHINGTON POST
Case Number: 1:2008cv02206
Filed: December 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Ricardo M. Urbina
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 9 the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; denying 10 the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 03/30/2010. (EN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WASHINGTON MAILERS UNION LOCAL M-29 v. WASHINGTON POST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON MAILERS UNION LOCAL M-29
Represented By: Alexia Fay McCaskill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON POST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?