GIBSON-MICHAELS v. BAIR et al

Plaintiff: YOLANDA C. GIBSON-MICHAELS
Defendant: SHEILA C. BAIR and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2009cv00022
Filed: January 9, 2009
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 8, 2009 3 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Henry H. Kennedy on 12/18/08. (ls, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GIBSON-MICHAELS v. BAIR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YOLANDA C. GIBSON-MICHAELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHEILA C. BAIR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.