YORK v. HARVEY
Plaintiff: LAWANDA YORK
Defendant: FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Case Number: 1:2009cv00075
Filed: January 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the defendant's 33 Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 27, 2012. (lcbah1)
March 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 22, 2010. (lcckk1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YORK v. HARVEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAWANDA YORK
Represented By: Ari Taragin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCIS J. HARVEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?