WILEY v. NEBF INVESTMENTS
Plaintiff: REESHA WILEY
Defendant: NEBF INVESTMENTS
Case Number: 1:2009cv00223
Filed: February 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Ellen S. Huvelle
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION accompanying Order 14 granting motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on January 12, 2010. (AG)
January 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENTERED IN ERROR.....MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on January 12, 2010. (lcesh1) Modified on 1/13/2010 (jf, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILEY v. NEBF INVESTMENTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REESHA WILEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEBF INVESTMENTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?