LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC v. WIDDER
LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC |
JOEL WIDDER |
1:2009cv00302 |
February 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Contract: Other Office |
11001 |
John M. Facciola |
Emmet G. Sullivan |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 32 Motion in Limine; 38 Motion to Dismiss; and 42 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 07/28/2010. (lcjmf1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC v. WIDDER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC | |
Represented By: | Rebecca Woods |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JOEL WIDDER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.