LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC v. WIDDER
Plaintiff: LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant: JOEL WIDDER
Case Number: 1:2009cv00302
Filed: February 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: John M. Facciola
Presiding Judge: Emmet G. Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 32 Motion in Limine; 38 Motion to Dismiss; and 42 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 07/28/2010. (lcjmf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC v. WIDDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES LLC
Represented By: Rebecca Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOEL WIDDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?