BAILEY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
MARY J. BAILEY |
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY |
1:2009cv01027 |
June 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Ricardo M. Urbina |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION to 27 ORDER. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/16/2011. (lcjeb2) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 03/17/2010. (lcrmu1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BAILEY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MARY J. BAILEY | |
Represented By: | David A. Branch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.