AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Case Number: 1:2009cv01218
Filed: July 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 39 U.S.C. ยง 1208 1970 Postal Act-enforced supervision by parent union
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 29 motion for attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 5/12/10. (lcesh2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Jennifer E. Ku
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?