SHORTS v. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SHORTS
Defendant: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
Case Number: 1:2009cv01571
Filed: August 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Henry H. Kennedy
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding 3 , 4 Motion of Defendant to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration Pursuant to the Agreed-Upon Employee Dispute Resolution Process. Signed by Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. on January 19, 2010. (NP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHORTS v. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SHORTS
Represented By: Michael J. Kator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?