JEREZ v. REPUBLIC OF CUBA et al
| NILO JEREZ |
| REPUBLIC OF CUBA, FIDEL CASTRO RUZ, RAUL CASTRO RUZ, THE CUBAN REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES and EL MINISTERIO DEL INTERIOR |
| 1:2009mc00466 |
| September 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Unassigned |
| None |
| Registration of Foreign Judgment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's objections 111 be, and hereby are, OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that the third party movants' motion 120 for leave to file a surreply and the plaintiff's motion 127 for a status conference and/or oral argument on his objections be, and hereby are, DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 8/29/2013. (lcrwr1)
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION addressing Third-Parties' Motion to Vacate Writ of Attachment 10 ; Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Writ of Attachment should not be Issued Against Agencies and Instrumentalities 48 ; and Camara de Comercio's Motion to Vacate Writ with respect to Registration of Certification Mark for Cuban Cigars 61 . A separate Order follows. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay on 03/29/2011. (DM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
