DANIEL et al v. FULWOOD et al
ROY A DANIEL, ALFONSO TAYLOR, HAROLD VENABLE, PERCY JETER, ABDUS-SHAHID ALI and WILLIAM TERRY |
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL and PATRICIA K. CUSHWA |
1:2010cv00862 |
May 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Ellen S. Huvelle |
Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Defendant's 102 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in Part. Please see the attached Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 6/11/2018. (lcapm2) Modified on 6/11/2018. Modified document type on 6/12/2018 (zjd). |
Filing 99 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 81 Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. See the attached Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 2/13/2018. (lcapm2) |
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. Please see attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 07/20/2015. (lcapm2) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiffs' motion 29 for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 09/27/2012. (DCL) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 17 the defendants' motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Ricardo M. Urbina on 9/30/11. (TA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.