DE CSEPEL et al v. REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY et al
DAVID L. DE CSEPEL, ANGELA MARIA HERZOG and JULIA ALICE HERZOG |
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, HUNGARIAN NATIONAL GALLERY, MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS, MUSEUM OF APPLIED ARTS and BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS |
1:2010cv01261 |
July 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Ellen S. Huvelle |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 240 MEMORANDUM OPINION. See text of Opinion for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 9/28/2023. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 205 ORDER denying 199 defendants' motion to stay. See text of Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 8/1/2022. (lcjdb1) |
Filing 180 MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying 179 Order granting in part and denying in part 148 defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on May 11, 2020. (lcav) |
Filing 124 MEMORANDUM OPINION re defendants' 106 Renewed Motion to Dismiss and defendants' 107 Motion to Take Judicial Notice. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on March 14, 2016. (lcesh2) |
Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 86 defendants' motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on December 12, 2014. (lcesh2) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on September 1, 2011. (lcesh2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.