WEINSTEIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Plaintiff: STANFORD B. WEINSTEIN
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Case Number: 1:2010cv01768
Filed: October 19, 2010
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: John D. Bates
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 21, 2013 57 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 40 the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, 42 the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, and 43 the plaintiff's motion to strike. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/21/13. (TA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WEINSTEIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STANFORD B. WEINSTEIN
Represented By: Judah Lifschitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.