CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE et al v. SALAZAR et al
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, TRIBAL COUNCIL, YAKIMA DIXIE, VELMA WHITEBEAR, ANTONIA LOPEZ, MICHAEL MENDIBLES, EVELYN WILSON and ANTOINE AZEVEDO |
LARRY ECHO HAWK, MICHAEL BLACK and KEN SALAZAR |
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE |
1:2011cv00160 |
January 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Richard W. Roberts |
Other Statutory Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER granting 49 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 51 Motion for Leave to Supplement Administrative Record; denying 56 Federal Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on 12/13/13. (Reed, Heather) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding 58 Motion to Dismiss and 72 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein on 9/6/2013. (Reed, Heather) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the proposed intervenor-defendant's amended motion 35 for leave to intervene as defendant, granting the proposed intervenor-defendant's motion 36 to expedite, granting nunc pro tunc the parties' ; joint motion 41 to extend time for plaintiffs to request supplementation of the administrative record, granting nunc pro tunc the parties' amended joint motion 47 for briefing schedule, denying as moot the parties' joint motion 38 f or briefing schedule, and ordering the parties and the intervenor to meet and confer and file by April 4, 2012 a joint status report and proposed order reflecting deadlines for opposing and replying in support of the intervenor's motion to dismi ss and proposing any necessary amendments to the briefing schedule for the parties' cross motions for summary judgment. The Clerk's Office is directed to DOCKET Exhibits 3 through 7 to the proposed intervenor-defendant's amended motion 35 for leave to intervene as the intervenor-defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard W. Roberts on 3/26/2012. (lcrwr1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.