UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. SEBELIUS
| UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. |
| KATHLEEN SEBELIUS |
| 1:2011cv00260 |
| January 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| John D. Bates |
| Medicare Act |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 4/17/2012. (lcjdb2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. SEBELIUS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Ann Webster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell P. Zeff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
