NU IMAGE, INC. v. DOES Featured Case
Plaintiff: NU IMAGE, INC.
Defendant: DOES
Case Number: 1:2011cv00301
Filed: February 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Robert L. Wilkins
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2011 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by NU IMAGE, INC. (Kurtz, Nicholas)
July 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Denying 5 MOTION for Order FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE ; Plaintiff can file a new motion for expedited discovery in accordance with the terms of this Order by August 15, 2011. This matter is scheduled for further hearing on August 25, 2011 at 9:30 A.M in courtroom 17 before Judge Robert L. Wilkins. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 7/29/2011. (lcrlw3)
July 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 5 MOTION for Order FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 7/29/2011. (lcrlw3)
June 21, 2011 Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by NU IMAGE, INC. re 9 Order to Show Cause,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Discovery Plan)(Kurtz, Nicholas)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. By June 21, 2011, Plaintiff, if it intends to pursue the previously filed motion for expedited discovery, DOC 5 , shall show cause why venue and joinder is proper for all putative defendants in this case. Alternatively, Plaintiff may seek leave to amend its complaint and file a new motion for expedited discovery, addressing why venue and joinder is proper as to each. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed discovery plan that: 1) sets forth a time certain for which it seeks to pursue non-party discovery on an expedited basis; and 2) outlines how Plaintiff intends to serve each defendant within 120 days of filing the amended complaint pursuant to Rule 4(m) or proposes any extensions Plaintiff may seek in order to effectuate service on all named defendants. Show Cause Response due by 6/21/2011. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 6/7/2011. (lcrlw3, )
June 2, 2011 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the Court's Order DE 6 granting DE 5 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE is VACATED until further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 6/2/2011. (tcb)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that a Status Conference is set for June 2, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 17 before Judge Robert L. Wilkins. Counsel should come prepared to discuss the discovery taken thus far with respect to the putative defendants identified in the Original Complaint filed on 3/11/2011. Counsel should also come prepared to discuss any discovery efforts made with respect to the additional putative defendants identified in the Amended Complaint filed on 5/4/2011, and the basis for venue, joinder, and personal jurisdiction with respect to all putative defendants. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 5/25/2011. (tcb)
May 4, 2011 Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DOES filed by NU IMAGE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(znmw, )
March 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 VACATED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDERED DATED 6/2/2011.....ORDER granting 5 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE; it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is allowed to serve immediate discovery on the internet service providers (ISPs) listed in Exhibit C to Plaintiffs Motion to obtain the identity of each Doe Defendant, including those Doe Defendants for which Plaintiff has already identified an Internet Protocol (IP) address and those Doe Defendants for which Plaintiff identifies IP addresses during the course of this litigation; it is further ORDERED that any information disclosed to Plaintiff in response to a Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiffs rights; it is further ORDERED that the ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information pending the resolution of any timely filed motion to quash; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide each ISP with a copy of this Order.. Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 3/17/2011. (See Order for full details) (tcb) . Modified on 6/2/2011 (tcb).
February 17, 2011 Filing 5 MOTION for Order FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE by NU IMAGE, INC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Kurtz, Nicholas)
February 4, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616036268) filed by NU IMAGE, INC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rdj)
February 4, 2011 SUMMONS Not Issued as to DOES (rdj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NU IMAGE, INC. v. DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NU IMAGE, INC.
Represented By: Thomas Mansfield Dunlap
Represented By: Nicholas A. Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?