JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
| JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 1:2011cv00604 |
| March 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING AND PROCEDURES ORDER. Upon review of the parties' 7 Joint Status Report, and in order to administer this civil action in a manner fair to the litigants and consistent with the parties' interest in completing this litigation in the shortest possible time and at the least possible cost, the parties are directed to comply with each of the directives set forth in this Order. In addition, the parties shall adhere to the following schedule: on or before Friday, May 27, 2011, at 5:00 p.m., Defendant shall produce the approximately 240 pages of records to Plaintiff as contemplated; on or before Friday, June 10, 2011, at 5:00 p.m., Plaintiff shall serve a written notice upon Defendant (i) identifying any concerns or objections it may have as to Defendant's production, and (ii) indicating whether it is requesting a Vaughn index as to Defendant's withholding decisions; on or before Friday, June 24, 2011 at 5:00 p.m., if requested by Plaintiff in accordance with the foregoing paragraph, Defendant shall serve a Vaughn index upon Plaintiff; on or before Friday, July 1, 2011, at 5:00 p.m., the parties shall file a Joint Status Report with the Court (i) advising the Court of the status of the parties' negotiations, and (ii) proposing a schedule for further proceedings in this action, if necessary. Additional dates will be set as necessary. The dates identified are firm; the Court has endeavored to give the parties the schedule that they have requested and expects that they will adhere to that schedule. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on May 13, 2011. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Aldrich, Jason) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to 1 Complaint by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.(Dworkowitz, Gregory) |
|
MINUTE ORDER (paperless). Plaintiff filed the 1 Complaint in this action on March 23, 2011. Defendant filed its 6 Answer on April 27, 2011. The action now appears ready to proceed to the briefing of dispositive motions. Accordingly, the parties shall promptly meet and confer and, on or before Thursday, May 12, 2011, file a Joint Status Report with the Court, which shall, at a minimum, (a) propose a schedule for the briefing of dispositive motions in this action, (b) indicate whether aVaughn index will be required and, if so, propose dates for the preparation and exchange of the index, and (c) indicate whether the parties intend to use a sample of the records at issue for purposes of briefing their dispositive motions and, if so, propose a procedure for selecting and certifying the sample. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on April 27, 2011. (lcckk3)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Peter Dworkowitz on behalf of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (Dworkowitz, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 3/28/2011, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 3/28/2011. (See Docket Entry 3 to view document). (znmw, ) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 3/28/2011. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 4/27/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Cristina Rotaru)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. identifying Corporate Parent NONE for JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (td, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616037428) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(td, ) |
| SUMMONS (3) Issued as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jason B. Aldrich |
| Represented By: | Paul J. Orfanedes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Peter Dworkowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
