FANTHAM et al v. RONCO CONSULTING CORPORATION

Plaintiff: STEPHEN FANTHAM and TRISTINE FANTHAM
Defendant: RONCO CONSULTING CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2011cv00762
Filed: April 20, 2011
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: James E. Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FANTHAM et al v. RONCO CONSULTING CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHEN FANTHAM
Represented By: James A. McGuinness
Represented By: Blake T. Hannafan
Represented By: Peter C. Grenier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRISTINE FANTHAM
Represented By: Peter C. Grenier
Represented By: Blake T. Hannafan
Represented By: James A. McGuinness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RONCO CONSULTING CORPORATION
Represented By: Alison Suthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.