CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON |
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION |
1:2011cv00951 |
May 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Deeley on behalf of FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (Deeley, Kevin) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Brett Kolker on behalf of FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (Kolker, David) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE re 8 Notice (Other) of Recent Decision filed by FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. (Hajjar, Steve) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Recent Decision by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON re 5 Memorandum in Opposition, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Weismann, Anne) |
Filing 7 REPLY to opposition to motion re 4 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. (Hajjar, Steve) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Erratum by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON re 5 Memorandum in Opposition, (Attachments: # 1 Errata)(Weismann, Anne) |
Filing 5 Memorandum in opposition to re 4 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Statement of Facts, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Weismann, Anne) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration)(Hajjar, Steve). Added MOTION for Summary Judgment on 6/24/2011 (znmw, ). |
Filing 3 ORDER Establishing Procedures for Electronic Filing for Cases Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, signed on May 24, 2011. (SM) |
Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests NONE by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON (jf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616039011) filed by CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jf, ) |
SUMMONS (3) Issued as to FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (jf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON | |
Represented By: | Anne L. Weismann |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.