MERCADANTE et al v. XE SERVICES, LLC et al
| C. J. MERCADANTE, ROBERT BIDDLE, JOHNNY JEFFERSON and PHILLIP W. OHARA |
| XE SERVICES, LLC, U.S. TRAINING CENTER, INC., BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC, BLACKWATER WORLDWIDE and BLACKWATER TRUST AND PLAN TRUSTEES |
| 1:2011cv01044 |
| June 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding 93 ORDER Dismissing Case with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 11/29/2017. (lcckk3)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER holding in abeyance Defendants' 71 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/19/2016. (lcckk2)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 1/15/2015. (lcckk2)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' 14 Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants shall file a renewed motion to compel arbitration, accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, by no later than June 8, 2012; Plaintiffs shall file their opposition, accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, by no later than June 25, 2012; and D efendants shall file their reply, accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities not to exceed ten (10) pages, by no later than July 5, 2012. The parties' briefing should be focused on the question of whether Defendants may invoke the de legation agreement in this case in order to compel the arbitration of gateway questions of arbitrability. However, the parties may also address the question of whether the Court should nonetheless find the merits of their dispute arbitrable even if the delegation agreement itself cannot be invoked in this case. The parties are warned that submissions that stray into collateral or irrelevant matters may be stricken and the offending party subjected to sanctions. The parties may not incorporate arguments in prior submissions. Furthermore, because "the appropriate standard of review [in this context] is the same standard used in resolving summary judgment motions," Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 267 F. Supp 2d 61, 67 (D.D.C. 200 3), when briefing Defendants' renewed motion to compel, the parties shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, Local Civil Rule 7(h), and Paragraph 6 of this Court's Scheduling and Procedures Order, filed this same date. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on May 22, 2012. (lcckk3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
