KUCINICH et al v. OBAMA et al
Ten members of Congress sued President Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, alleging that the United States illegally went to war against Libya without first obtaining congressional authorization as required under the U.S. Constitution.
DENNIS KUCINICH, WALTER B. JONES, JOHN CONYERS, JR., ROSCOE BARTLETT, MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, DAN BURTON, HOWARD COBLE, JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON and RON PAUL |
BARACK OBAMA and ROBERT GATES |
1:2011cv01096 |
June 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Reggie B. Walton |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 12 REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ROBERT GATES, BARACK OBAMA. (Womack, Eric) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re 10 Memorandum in Opposition, was entered in error because it is an incorrect duplicate to Docket Entry 11 (dr) |
Filing 11 Memorandum in opposition to re 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ROSCOE BARTLETT, DAN BURTON, MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, HOWARD COBLE, JOHN CONYERS, JR, JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR, TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, WALTER B. JONES, DENNIS KUCINICH, RON PAUL. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Turley, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 ENTERED IN ERROR.....Memorandum in opposition to re 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ROSCOE BARTLETT, DAN BURTON, MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, HOWARD COBLE, JOHN CONYERS, JR, JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR, TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, WALTER B. JONES, DENNIS KUCINICH, RON PAUL. (Turley, Jonathan) Modified on 9/12/2011 (dr). |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Response to motion to dismiss due by 9/9/2011 (mpt, ) |
|
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 8 MOTION to Dismiss by ROSCOE BARTLETT, DAN BURTON, MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, HOWARD COBLE, JOHN CONYERS, JR, JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR, TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, WALTER B. JONES, DENNIS KUCINICH, RON PAUL (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Turley, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by ROBERT GATES, BARACK OBAMA (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Womack, Eric) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by All Defendants. Case related to Case No. 11-1409. (Womack, Eric) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric R. Womack on behalf of All Defendants (Womack, Eric) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ROBERT GATES served on 6/24/2011 (Turley, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. BARACK OBAMA served on 6/20/2011 (Turley, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 6/21/2011. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/20/2011. (Turley, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 6/21/2011. (Turley, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT GATES, BARACK OBAMA ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616039707) filed by DAN BURTON, WALTER B. JONES, ROSCOE BARTLETT, MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, TIMOTHY V. JOHNSON, JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR, DENNIS KUCINICH, RON PAUL, HOWARD COBLE, JOHN CONYERS, JR. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(td, ) |
SUMMONS (4) Issued as to ROBERT GATES, BARACK OBAMA, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (td, ) Modified on 7/1/2011 to edit number of summons issued (dr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.