STATE OF ARIZONA v. HOLDER
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Case Number: 1:2011cv01559
Filed: August 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: John D. Bates
Nature of Suit: Voting
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1973
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 11 Arizona's Renewed Motion to Convene a Three-Judge Court. See text for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/11/2012. (lcjdb1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STATE OF ARIZONA v. HOLDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: James E. Barton, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Represented By: Risa Berkower
Represented By: Richard Alan Dellheim
Represented By: Jared Michael Slade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?