CELLULAR SOUTH, INC. et al v. AT&T, INC. et al
Plaintiff: CELLULAR SOUTH, INC. and CORR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C.
Defendant: AT&T, INC., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Case Number: 1:2011cv01690
Filed: September 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Ellen S. Huvelle
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 17 defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on November 2, 2011. (lcesh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CELLULAR SOUTH, INC. et al v. AT&T, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CELLULAR SOUTH, INC.
Represented By: Charles L. McBride, Jr.
Represented By: Brian C. Kimball
Represented By: Matthew I. Kepniss
Represented By: Kenneth Patrick Ky Ewing
Represented By: Walter H. Boone
Represented By: Daniel Mulholland
Represented By: Chong S. Park
Represented By: Alan W. Perry
Represented By: Joseph A. Sclafani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CORR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C.
Represented By: Kenneth Patrick Ky Ewing
Represented By: Matthew I. Kepniss
Represented By: Brian C. Kimball
Represented By: Chong S. Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T, INC.
Represented By: Mark C. Hansen
Represented By: Michael K. Kellogg
Represented By: Aaron Martin Panner
Represented By: James M. Webster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Represented By: Mark C. Hansen
Represented By: Michael K. Kellogg
Represented By: Aaron Martin Panner
Represented By: James M. Webster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Represented By: George S. Cary
Represented By: Mark C. Hansen
Represented By: Mark W. Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Represented By: George S. Cary
Represented By: Mark C. Hansen
Represented By: Mark W. Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?