DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. et al v. SEBELIUS
| CENTRAL MONTGOMERY MEDICAL CENTER, L.L.C., UHS OF NEW ORLEANS, INC., UHS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, LAREDO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, L.P., DOCTORS' HOSPITAL OF SHREVEPORT, INC., MCALLEN HOSPITAL, L.P., UHS OF FAIRMOUNT, INC., FOREST VIEW PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER, L.P., GLEN OAKS HOSPITAL, INC., UHS OF LAKESIDE, LLC, MANATEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, L.P., PENDLETON METHODIST HOSPITAL, L.L.C., SPARKS FAMILY HOSPITAL, INC., NORTHWEST TEXAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., PAVILLION FOUNDATION, UHS OF RIDGE, LLC, RIVER CREST HOSPITAL, INC., RIVER OAKS, INC., UHS OF OKLAHOMA, INC., SUMMERLIN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, L.P., UHS OF TIMBERLAWN, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., UHS OF WESTWOOD PEMBROKE, INC., DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARTNERS, L.P., AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, INC., UHS OF ANCHOR, L.P. and AUBURN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. |
| KATHLEEN G. SEBELIUS |
| 1:2011cv01717 |
| September 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Gladys Kessler |
| Medicare Act |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION to the Order granting Plaintiffs' Opening Brief and denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 3/26/13. (CL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
