MERIWETHER v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff: REGINA MERIWETHER
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 1:2012cv00067
Filed: January 17, 2012
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Reggie B. Walton
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 19, 2015 12 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kay, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Reversal and Defendant's 7 Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, and REMANDING matter to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 05/19/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (lckbj1, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MERIWETHER v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REGINA MERIWETHER
Represented By: Stephen F. Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.