KOCH v. SCHAPIRO et al
Plaintiff: RANDOLPH S. KOCH
Defendant: MARY SCHAPIRO and SUSAN R. LARSON
Case Number: 1:2012cv00301
Filed: February 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Friedman
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that plaintiff's notice of appeal be considered timely filed, and that the Clerk of this Court is directed to transmit to the court of appeals a copy of this order. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on January 30, 2015. (MA)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 23 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on June 11, 2014. (MA)
September 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION dismissing the complaint with prejudice and dismissing the action in its entirety. An order consistent with this opinion will issue this same day. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on September 10, 2013. (MA)
February 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that plaintiff shall respond to defendants' dispositive motions on or before February 28, 2013: (1) defendant's motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment in Civil Action No. 09-2111 [Dkt. 8]; (2) defendant's motion to dismiss in Civil Action No. 11-1645 [Dtk. 6]; (3) defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment in Civil Action No. 12-0301 [Dkt. 15]. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on February 15, 2013. (MA)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re briefing schedule. The court's March 30, 2011 order staying Civil Action Nos. 08-1521, 09-2111 and 10-0150 is vacated. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on June 25, 2012. (MA)
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 49 defendant's motion for the setting of a status conference in Civil Action No. 08-1521. The parties shall appear for a status conference on May 4, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. At that status conference, plaintiff shall show cause why the court's stay order should not be lifted and why he should not be required to file responses to all pending dispositive motions promptly. Plaintiff shall be permitted to appear by telephone for the status conference. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on April 25, 2012. (MA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KOCH v. SCHAPIRO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RANDOLPH S. KOCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARY SCHAPIRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN R. LARSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?