CAMPBELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
| JENNIFER B. CAMPBELL |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and WAYNE M. TURNAGE |
| 1:2012cv01769 |
| October 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 84 Plaintiff's Motion for Fees and Costs. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/29/2016. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 83 Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 5/25/2016. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 69 Plaintiff's request for equitable relief and entering judgment for Plaintiff. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/20/2016. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 24 Defendant's motion for summary judgment. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/4/2015. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/23/2013. (lcrc3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
