DIAG HUMAN S.E. v. CZECH REPUBLIC-MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Plaintiff: DIAG HUMAN S.E.
Defendant: CZECH REPUBLIC-MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Case Number: 1:2013cv00355
Filed: March 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 99999
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0202 Award under Convention on Foreign Arbitral Awards
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 9/27/17. (DMK)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 8/14/14. (DMK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DIAG HUMAN S.E. v. CZECH REPUBLIC-MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DIAG HUMAN S.E.
Represented By: James Richard Schiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CZECH REPUBLIC-MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?