CPF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC v. GOEL SERVICES INC et al

Plaintiff: CPF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC
Defendant: GOEL SERVICES INC and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Case Number: 1:2013cv00381
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Referring Judge: Deborah A. Robinson
Presiding Judge: Robert L. Wilkins
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 28:1352 Miller Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CPF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC v. GOEL SERVICES INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CPF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC
Represented By: Andrew North Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GOEL SERVICES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?